Debate as a Job: Interactions with Speech and Debate After Graduation

Parker Murray | 2/19/2025

Parker Murray studies Sustainability and Geosciences at the University of Texas at Austin and is a community debate judge. As a competitor, they participated in LD, CX, Extemp, and briefly Congress across all four years of High School. They have presided over nearly 160 rounds of LD, PF, and CX in 2 years of judging between the national and local Austin and San Antonio circuits and worked at the University of Houston’s 2024 Honors Debate Workshop. 



It’s been four years, you had your fun, but all good things must come to an end. If you’re like me, you love debate. It may seem difficult to let that go after graduation, especially if you spent multiple years building relationships and habits associated with debate. You developed complex technical and strategic vision, you spent countless hours researching and reading for the smallest leg-up over your competition, and while debate does have real world benefits, there aren’t many ways to continue to develop or use many of the skills you spent several years building. Rather than letting that time go to waste, you consider these options:









In my admittedly short time outside the bubble of competition, I’ve learned a lot about debate from the other side. Since graduating, I’ve also become more aware of the often-unethical practices that make this activity run. I hope this article can serve two purposes; the first is to advise those who are graduating on how to stay active in the community and keep supporting the next generation of debaters. The second is as a warning: despite its progressive culture, forensics is a business and is just as willing to take advantage of your labor as any other job.  



College Debate 

At the top, I should note that I do not compete in college debate. I am therefore not the best resource for information about the activity, and if you have questions about what college debate looks like, you should reach out to the debate programs of the schools you’re considering attending. However, I still think my advice here is worth something, so I’ll give it anyway, if for no other reason than to explain why I’m not involved in it. 



College debate is above all else a massive time commitment. It can open doors to coaching and judging, but you will be engaging with infinitely more complex arguments, better funded and resourced opponents, and be expected to participate, practice, and prepare for more time than you ever would or could in high school. This is not automatically a disqualifier and college debate can be incredibly fulfilling, but you should seek out opportunities that can translate this into a career. My view of college speech/debate is that it is a phenomenal opportunity if you are compensated for your time through scholarships and additional funding. If you’re dead-set on competing in college, reach out to coaches while you’re in high school to learn more about their events (most schools only do one or two events!), funding opportunities, and how much competition you will be able to access. In my opinion, college debate is not a worthwhile investment of time if you don’t get paid for it, and ultimately, most people will not have that opportunity.  



Coaching 

Private, independent coaching is a difficult sphere to break into. However, this can be a good opportunity for people who are especially knowledgeable and want to continue having the opportunity to “play the game” without competing themselves. You can learn new skills in teaching others, that’s great if you want to pursue teaching after college. You also get to keep prepping, keep engaged with the activity, and generally keep doing many of the things you enjoy most about debate. 



Here are a couple of things to consider with coaching: 













If you choose to pursue coaching, good for you! You should reach out to schools in areas where people might know you. You can also reach out on the myriad of debate-centered Facebook pages. Your high school coaches might also have connections which can be useful to find clients, as can other groups, such as friends on your circuit. The important thing is to get your name out there and ensure that you are doing the work people expect of you.  



Judging 

Certainly, the easiest way to stay involved with debate is by judging for tournaments. You should start judging on a circuit similar to what you competed in. Then you can expand your range to judging different circuits and different events as you become a better judge. Consider the following a simple “how to be a judge” guide: 

















Fair Compensation and Burnout 

Debate is fun as a student, so why wouldn’t it be fun as a job? Here are a couple things to consider. 









There is no union, so we must work together to avoid being exploited. Judging is a privilege, not a paycheck, but you should not accept less than you are worth or less than the average tournament’s rate to judge, as low paid judging at successful tournaments will signal to other tournaments that low rates are workable. It is better to pass on a few opportunities and look elsewhere than to accept sub-minimum wage rates which are the norm in so many places. 



You should also consider that you are an independent contractor, and you will not have taxes taken out of your checks, consider this while setting your rates and planning your budget. If you make more than $400 in a calendar year, you will owe roughly 15.3% of your income from debate to the federal government in what would traditionally be payroll taxes, so Social Security and Medicare. Save checks, receipts, and keep a spreadsheet of how much you are being paid to make taxes easier. You will have complex taxes, unfortunately I’m not qualified to offer better advice than to pay attention.



Finally, a note on the off-season. If you intend to work at a summer camp for debate, you should absolutely be aware of how much your coworkers are being paid and how much work you will be doing. Have clear expectations of hours and pay special attention to the work you will be expected to complete before camp begins, as this is largely unpaid. Do not accept low offers just to get experience, it will rarely pay off. Most states have laws that explicitly allow summer programs for children to underpay their workers, do not work for less than you are worth, you will regret it, and it will heighten burnout. 



First-year-outs are some of the most exploited people in debate because they are still working out how they should participate in the activity, they don’t know the norms of this new section of forensics, and they are disastrously easy to low-ball because they don’t know how much they should be getting paid. Pay attention to how much you are being paid and if it doesn’t make sense, ask for more or seek opportunities elsewhere. Be skeptical of offers from organizations you have never heard of and determine payment details (in writing) before you accept any employment. If you haven’t heard of an organization, look them up or ask around to determine if they’re legitimate and trustworthy. 



Conclusion 

I hope this article is useful in teaching people what they need to do to stay active in forensics after graduation than convincing people not to return. I truly am thankful for this activity, and I am very happy that I can continue to support people’s speech and debate careers. With that being said, it is important that expectations are set appropriately for the next generation of students transitioning to college and I want to do my part to eliminate some of the exploitation which is prevalent within the activity. And while this article itself may be useful, I think that this goal will ultimately succeed only if we have uncomfortable conversations about compensation frequently. I would call all program directors to be more upfront with community members about their compensation practices, and I especially think that coaches should educate their students about the business side of speech and debate as they near graduation. Finally, we should all recognize what qualified judges provide to this activity and consider how our payment schemes prevent many qualified judges from participating.